In Solidarity with Newark, Parents, Teachers & Administrators Fighting for Children

(Use the links below to get caught up on the state of Education in Newark, New Jersey. Englewood is not immune. If Dwight Morrow High School is allowed to slip into the designation of PRIORITY SCHOOL it also, will be in danger of closing. Do you really want to put your children on a bus knowing that you will not see their faces in some cases until after dark. It is time to stand. It is time to be an example. Be strong.) 

All,

As most of you know, there has been a dramatic burst of news in the past 24 hours.  Yesterday, Cami Anderson suspended - indefinitely and without pay pending an investigation - 5 NPS principals.  Long story short, 4 were suspended because they spoke out publicly in support of their students, parents, and teaching staff's, and against the destructive policies Anderson is ramming down our throats in dictatorial fashion.  While we do not fully understand the details of the fifth, we know it is in connection with Anderson's attempt to ban a parent (and PTO President for his school) from a school.  

This is a CLEAR attempt to intimidate her critics, and to stunt the growing movement against her destructive policies.  

NEW Caucus stands in solidarity with ALL who defend parents, students, and education workers from the unrelenting attacks from the corporate and political elite.  We also stand with all who defend public education as an institution. 

More on how you can get involved will follow soon...

 

With that said, here is just a smattering of the news from the past week (the news of the suspensions are at the bottom):

1)  3 excellent pieces from Labor Notes.  One a book review on a book about the "sham" of corporate education "reform."  A second on the Los Angeles slate running for election in their union election (hint: they're trying to rebuild and reorient their teachers union just like we're trying to do here!).  The final piece is an inspiring piece about students in Portland standing by their teachers.  

http://www.labornotes.org/blogs/2014/01/review-sham-school-reform

http://www.labornotes.org/2014/01/la-teachers-run-bigger-vision

http://labornotes.org/2014/01/portland-students-pack-school-board-meeting-back-teachers-union

2)  3 NJ Spotlight articles.  One on the charter school stampede into Camden to take advantage of the new Christie appointee's largesse, a second on Christie's push for longer school days, and a map on length of school days throughout the state.  

 http://new.njs.agora.com/stories/14/01/12/camden-rfp-for-renaissance-schools-pulls-in-some-big-names/

http://new.njs.agora.com/stories/14/01/14/christie-calls-for-longer-school-day-calendar-in-state-of-the-state/

http://new.njs.agora.com/stories/14/01/16/length-of-school-day/

3)  Star Ledger actually published an article on the growing parent resistance!

http://www.nj.com/education/2014/01/newark_parents_critical_of_school_reorganization_plan.html#incart_river

4)  Piece from Salon about the corporate connections and influence in education policy making.

http://www.salon.com/2014/01/14/the_influence_of_michelle_rhee_and_chris_christie_education_reformers_revolving_door/?source=newsletter

5)  Bill introduced into the New Jersey Senate this week that would make it easier for the state to control and monitor private (read corporate, hedge fund, etc) gifts to state controlled public school districts.

https://www.govtrack.us/states/nj/bills/413e4d3f5b59/s283?utm_campaign=govtrack_email_update&utm_source=govtrack/email_update&utm_medium=email

6)  Bob Braun's good description of the principal suspensions.

http://bobbraunsledger.com/newark-school-boss-anderson-cracks-down-on-critics-suspends-five-principals-in-one-day/

7)  Jersey Jazzman's take on the suspensions, with Ras Baraka's statement.

http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2014/01/newark-state-superintendent-cami.html

8)  Perhaps most important, a piece from Edweek (nationwide magazine) covering the suspensions.  To our knowledge this is the first attention given the events by a national outlet.  

http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/01/newark_principals_speak_out_ge.html

In Solidarity,

Newark Education Workers Caucus

(NEW Caucus)

 

BECOME A MEMBER! CLICK HERE

862-367-9211 

Facebook.com/NEWCaucus

Twitter.com/NEWCaucus

YouTube.com/user/NEWCaucus

Google Calendar: NewarkEducationWorkersCaucus@gmail.com

NJ Municipal Tax Lien Auction Scams: Are You a Victim?

Is your home in foreclosure after being sold in a Municipal Tax Lien Sale? Do you remember this little blue slip of paper that arrived with our tax bills and was almost thrown away by many of us? 

According to the United States Department of Justice all is not well with Tax Lien Sales across the state of New Jersey. Unscrupulous individuals have been victimizing already distressed homeowners by rigging the bidding at Municipal Tax Lien Sales. 

I have been in a situation where paying my property taxes left me without enough money to buy food. Some of us find ourselves in that situation every quarter. I have been known to break my payments in half so as to have something left over. The warning on the slip above will not allow that. I understand the tremendous hardship a fraud like this causes. The financially strapped homeowner must pay mortgage and current taxes while attempting to pay off the lien plus interest. This rigging of tax lien sales drives up the cost so high that affected homeowners have no way of paying. The danger is not over. All Municipalities must become vigilant in the identification and apprehension of the silent invisible criminal that preys on those who are not faring well in these economically difficult times. Persons who have pleaded guilty may still participate in Municipal Tax Lien Sales. Check your foreclosure papers for the names listed below. Persons who have pleaded guilty have conditions which they must follow in relation to foreclosures that have already been served. It is time to resist. You may be able to recover monies even if you have already lost your home.

The United States Department of Justice - Office of Public Affairs - September 30, 2013 Two New Jersey Investors Plead Guilty for Their Roles in Bid-rigging Schemes at Municipal Tax Lien Auctions

“By conspiring to rig the bids of municipal tax liens, the conspirators profited at the expense of those already struggling financially,” said Scott D. Hammond, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division’s criminal enforcement program.  “Protecting Americans from these types of bid-rigging schemes remains a high priority for the division.”

According to the court documents, Del Vecchio Sr. and Mastellone were involved in the conspiracy with others not to bid against one another at municipal tax lien auctions in New Jersey.  Since the conspiracy permitted the conspirators to purchase tax liens with limited competition, each conspirator was able to obtain liens which earned a higher interest rate.  Property owners were therefore made to pay higher interest on their tax debts than they would have paid had their liens been purchased in open and honest competition, the department said.A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals.  The maximum fine for a Sherman Act violation may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims if either amount is greater than the $1 million statutory maximum.

Today’s pleas are the 13th and 14th guilty pleas resulting from an ongoing investigation into bid rigging or fraud related to municipal tax lien auctions.  Nine individuals – Isadore H. May, Richard J. Pisciotta Jr., William A. Collins, Robert W. Stein, David M. Farber, Robert E. Rothman, Stephen E. Hruby, David Butler and Norman T. Remick – and three companies –  DSBD LLC, Crusader Servicing Corp. and Mercer S.M.E. Inc. – have previously pleaded guilty as part of this investigation. "  US Department of Justice

Read comments by Michael R. Perle that describe a class action suit that was started because of conspiracies like this.

This is a link to a Public Press Release From the United States Department of Justice - April 25, 2013  http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2013/296272.pdf

All of the persons listed below have pleaded guilty to violation of the Sherman Act which carries a maximum of 10 years imprisonment and $1 million or more dollars in fines. This group is being prosecuted together.

• Joseph Wolfson, of Margate, N.J., was a part-owner of two entities that invested in municipal tax liens
• James Jeffers Jr. and 
• Betty Simon Trustee LLC and Richard Simon Trustee, both of Northfield, N.J.
• Gregg Gehring, of Newton, N.J., was employed by a major tax lien investment company as a vice president.
• James Jeffers Jr., of Burlington, N.J., was a bidder for Crusader Servicing Corp., which pleaded guilty to its role in the conspiracy in September 2012, and also a bidder for Crusader’s successor corporation.
• Robert Jeffrey, of Bradenton, Fla., was a bidder for both Crusader and its successor corporation.
• U.S. v. Joseph Wolfson, et al. Product or service: Tax liens  

  Hearing	Date and Time	Location
  Arraignment / bail hearing	January 8, 2014 12:00 p.m. Eastern	Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse Court Room: 4A Judge Faith S. Hochberg 50 Walnut St. Newark, NJ (973) 645-3730

• Defendants: Joseph Wolfson, Gregg Gehring; James Jeffers Jr, Robert Jeffrey, Betty Simon Trustee LLC, and Richard Simon Trustee  (Indictment of all parties)

The following are being prosecuted individually. Click on the names for Plea Agreements or Indictments - 

1. Isadore H. May, 
2. Richard J. Pisciotta Jr., 
3. William A. Collins, 
4. Robert W. Stein, 
5. David M. Farber,  
6. Robert E. Rothman, 
7. Stephen E. Hruby, 
8. David Butler, 
9. Norman T. Remick, 
10. Robert U. Del Vecchio Sr. - Sentencing hearing January 14, 2014. Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse, Post Office Court, Court Room 04
    Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh 
    50 Walnut St.  Newark, NJ   (Plea Agreement)
11. Michael Mastellone – Sentencing hearing - January 21, 2014 - Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse
    Post Office Court, Court Room 04 - Hon. Dennis M. Cavanaugh 
    50 Walnut St.  Newark, NJ    (Plea Agreement)

Three companies also pleaded guilty as part of this investigation: DSBD LLC, Crusader Servicing Corp., and Mercer S.M.E. Inc., 

Click here for step by step instructions on what to do If you have information about a possible antitrust violation or potential anti-competitive activity....see more

"This ongoing investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s New York Office and the FBI’s Atlantic City, N.J., office.  Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to municipal tax lien auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s New York Office at 212-335-8000, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm or contact the Atlantic City Resident Agency of the FBI at 609-677-6400."

What is the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force?

President Obama established the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force in November 2009 to hold accountable those who helped bring about the last financial crisis as well as those who would attempt to take advantage of the efforts at economic recovery. http://www.stopfraud.gov/iso/opa/stopfraud/2013/13-at-1234.html

Persons and companies in our town and immediate area have plead guilty to violation of antitrust laws (The Sherman Act) Use the information provided in the links below to learn how you may protect yourselves from antitrust scams. Learn to recognize Collusion. An educated consumer is the best weapon against this type of crime. We cannot continue to allow those who have more than enough to defraud those who are less fortunate.

Antitrust Enforcement and the Consumer

This pamphlet was prepared to alert consumers to the existence and importance 

of antitrust laws and to explain what you can do for antitrust enforcement and for yourself. 

Price Fixing, Bid Rigging, and Market Allocation Schemes: What They Are and What to Look For

American consumers have the right to expect the benefits of free and open competition — the best goods and services at the lowest prices. Public and private organizations often rely on a competitive bidding process to achieve that end. The competitive process only works, however, when competitors set prices honestly and independently. When competitors collude, prices are inflated and the customer is cheated. Price fixing, bid rigging, and other forms of collusion are illegal and are subject to criminal prosecution by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.

Red Flags of Collusion 

You can help prevent collusion in procurement and grant awards — or detect collusion after an award has been made — by using this simple four-part MAPS analysis:

Statutory Provisions and Guidelines of the Antitrust Division
http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/divisionmanual/chapter2.pdf

Related Articles:

• Pennsylvania company pleads guilty in N.J. tax lien conspiracy
• Class action suit sparked by N.J. woman over tax lien fraud joined by 9 other cases
• Real Estate Auction Bid-Rigging Rings Busted
• Feds Nab Corporate Bid Rigger in Tax Lien Auctions
• INVESTORS PLEAD GUILTY IN NJ TAX LIEN PROBE
• Tax Lien Bid-Rigging Schemer Settles Class Action - Robert E. Rothman of Englewood
• Six Investors indicted for their Roles in Bid Rigging Scheme at Municipal Tax Lien Auctions in New Jersey.   Robert U. Del Vecchio Sr.

Please share this information as widely as possible. It is the only way that we are assured of taking back what is ours. The information belongs to everyone. Spread the word. Reverse Robin Hoods do nothing for the welfare of the American People. We support the needy not the greedy.

Quote What I say, Not What You Wanted to Hear From a Supposed Community Activist...

I have been accused of being reckless, fierce and a provocateur.

I own up to and stand behind whatever I say. People who know me are well aware of this fact. Those who do not know me are sometimes careless in words they attribute to me. I was quoted in the Suburbanite issue of December 5, 2013 as saying something that I did not say,  in response to the Surveillance cameras to be installed on Palisade Avenue. I was thinking it, but I did not say it or anything like it.

Quote from the Suburbanite Article: attributed to: Jonathan King and Stephanie Noda

Walker chimed in. "How can we be sure that this won't lead to targeting people?"

I never said that and I do not believe I heard anyone else use those exact words. Please do not quote me on things I did not say. Besides, I say enough stuff so that is entirely not necessary.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You may quote this: The people of this town deserve the truth about how circumstances unfold in situations such as these. We expect the truth even from an outgoing Police Chief. It would have been a simple thing to accept the responsibility of applying for the cameras exclusively.

What would the truth have changed?

Smile...You are on Candid Camera!

The City Council voted tonight 4 to 1 to accept $400,000.00 for the purposes of installing surveillance cameras on Palisade Avenue.

Page 1 of 2 City Council Agenda. Click here.

Definition of Forfeited Properties

We were told that we are allowed to use Forfeited DEA Account money to install Surveillance Cameras. In my research, it has become clear that the use is specified in an application for procurement of Forfeited DEA Funds. You are only allowed to use the money in the way it was requested in the application. The money must be used for surveillance cameras, because that  is the way our police applied to use it.

The Adoptive Forfeiture Process

The process begins with a request for adoption,† which is then reviewed by the appropriate federal agency. If a forfeiture is adopted, the process continues to unfold as follows:

An agreement is signed, in which the local law enforcement agency promises the proceeds "shall be used for law enforcement purposes in accordance with the statutes and guidelines that govern equitable sharing" and also that 23

they will be used as the local agency specified in the application it submitted requesting
equitable sharing in that case. The agreement also states that "the misuse or misapplication of shared resources is prohibited" and will subject the local agency to sanctions.

When the proceeds from an adoptive forfeiture are shared with the participating local agency (or agencies), this is known as equitable sharing. Equitable sharing proceeds are considerable. During FY2007, for example, more than $400 million was paid out by the U.S. Justice Department's Assets Forfeiture Fund to state and local police agencies.

Despite the possible windfall that can result from an equitable sharing payout, there are a few restrictions on how the proceeds can be spent. First, payments are intended to enhance and supplement police resources and activities. Second, property and funds awarded must be used in accordance with specific federal guidelines: 

"Permissible uses of shared property include activities designed to enhance future investigations, such as payment of overtime, provision of police training, purchase of equipment, improvement of police facilities, upgrading of detention facilities, and conducting drug education awareness programs."

24 Third, there is an express requirement that the funds not be used to supplant agency resources.

http://www.popcenter.org/Responses/asset_forfeiture/print/